How to Answer “How Have You Influenced Teams That Don’t Report to You?”
Learn why hiring managers ask this question and how to craft compelling STAR-based stories that showcase your ability to influence cross-functional teams without direct authority.
Introduction
Influencing peers and cross-functional teams without direct authority is a key leadership skill in tech. Interviewers ask “How have you influenced teams that don’t report to you?” to gauge your ability to align diverse stakeholders, drive collaboration, and deliver impact beyond your immediate scope. A strong answer demonstrates how you build trust, communicate effectively, and achieve results through persuasion and partnership.
Why This Question Matters
• Reveals leadership style: Shows how you earn respect and motivate peers.
• Tests stakeholder management: Highlights your ability to understand and align different priorities.
• Assesses communication skills: Demonstrates clarity, empathy, and persuasion techniques.
• Validates impact: Proves you can deliver results in ambiguous or matrixed environments.
Strategy for Answering Effectively
Use the STAR method to structure your response:
Situation: Set the context—team, project, and challenge.
Task: Define your goal in influencing the other team.
Action: Detail concrete, repeatable steps you took to persuade and collaborate.
Result: Quantify or qualify the impact you achieved.
Key tips:
Emphasize relationship building: Show how you listened, empathized, and built credibility.
Highlight data and storytelling: Use metrics and narratives to make your case.
Focus on collaboration: Illustrate joint workshops, one-on-one coaching, or shared artifacts.
Tailor complexity to level: Pick examples that match the scale and scope for your target role.
Building Real Examples from Your Experience
Inventory potential stories: migrations, process improvements, shared libraries, or policy changes.
Identify your influence levers: demos, prototypes, pilots, playbooks, or training programs.
Gather outcomes: adoption rates, cycle time reduction, defect drop, or positive feedback.
Match scope to seniority: mid-level for single projects, senior for org-wide initiatives, leadership for multi-team transformations.
Practical Tips for Preparation
• Map your career milestones: Choose one story per seniority level you’d target.
• Quantify impact: Use percentages, time saved, defect rates, or satisfaction scores.
• Name collaborators: Call out teams, roles, and how you engaged them.
• Practice conciseness: Aim for a 2–3 minute response covering all STAR elements.
• Align with the role: Mirror scale, technologies, and leadership qualities in the job description.
Example Answers
Example 1: Mid-Level Professional (e.g., L5 Senior Software Engineer)
Situation: Our product team relied on manual regression tests maintained by the QA group, which led to two-week release cycles and a spike in post-release defects.
Task: As a Senior Software Engineer, I needed to persuade the QA team to adopt our automated test framework so we could shorten release time and improve quality.
Action:
1. Data Gathering: I ran the manual test suite twice, measured average execution time (40 hours) and defect escape rate (12%).
2. Prototype Demo: I automated a representative test case, reduced execution time to 5 minutes, and prepared a live demo for QA leads.
3. Stakeholder Workshop: I invited five QA engineers to a 60-minute brown-bag session where I walked through the demo, explained the framework’s architecture, and answered questions.
4. Collaborative Pilot: Paired with two QA engineers over two sprints, guiding them through writing and running their first five automated tests.
5. Documentation & Training: Created a step-by-step guide, published it in our wiki, and hosted two follow-up drop-in sessions to troubleshoot issues.
6. Feedback Loop: Collected feedback in a retrospective, iterated on the guide to address setup errors, and shared weekly progress metrics.
Result: Within three weeks, the QA team automated 80% of regression tests. Release cycles shortened from two weeks to five days, and post-release defects dropped by 30%. The QA manager later cited our collaboration as a key factor in improving team velocity.
Example 2: Senior Professional (e.g., L6 Staff Engineer/Manager)
Situation: Our organization had no unified configuration service, so each of six product teams managed settings differently, leading to misconfigurations on production and frequent rollbacks.
Task: As a Staff Engineer, I was tasked with designing a central configuration service and persuading all teams to migrate within one quarter.
Action:
1. Cross-Team Discovery: Organized five interviews with product, backend, and SRE leads to document pain points—lack of versioning, inconsistent rollout practices, and on-call incidents.
2. Proof-of-Concept: Built a lightweight service supporting versioned JSON configs, dynamic refresh, and RBAC controls. Deployed it in our staging environment.
3. Joint Workshop: Hosted a two-hour hands-on lab where representatives from each team configured feature toggles in the POC, measured error handling, and provided real-time feedback.
4. Migration Playbook: Drafted a step-by-step migration guide with code examples, rollback procedures, and best practices. Shared it via our internal engineering forum.
5. Office Hours & Mentoring: Held weekly drop-in sessions for two months to assist teams with code integration, troubleshoot issues, and collect improvement requests.
6. Adoption Dashboard: Created a Grafana dashboard tracking migration status by service, error rates, and configuration latency. Presented progress in our monthly engineering all-hands.
Result: By quarter’s end, all six product teams had migrated. Misconfigurations causing rollbacks decreased by 90%, deployment failures dropped by 60%, and teams reported a 25% faster feature rollout. Leadership recognized the service and playbook as a best practice for future platform initiatives.
Example 3: Senior Leadership (e.g., L7 Principal Engineer/Senior Manager)
Situation: Our company planned a transformation from monolithic APIs to microservices across 12 development teams, but there was no shared governance or best-practice alignment, resulting in duplicated toolchains and inconsistent performance SLAs.
Task: As Principal Engineer and platform lead, I needed to influence all teams to agree on a common architecture blueprint, shared frameworks, and governance processes.
Action: 1. Formation of a Governance Guild: Invited architects, tech leads, and product managers from all 12 teams to join a guild with a defined charter, quarterly goals, and success metrics. 2. Blueprint & Playbook: Co-authored a comprehensive microservices blueprint covering service design patterns, API contracts, observability standards, and deployment pipelines. Published it in our internal docs portal. 3. Pilot Projects: Selected three teams to run pilot migrations under my mentorship—pair-programming core modules, reviewing infrastructure-as-code, and setting up standardized CI/CD templates. 4. Hands-On Workshops: Conducted four half-day labs where I led end-to-end demos of service creation, health checks, circuit breakers, and metrics dashboards. 5. Executive Visibility: Shared a centralized dashboard tracking migration progress, latency metrics, and incident reduction. Presented results quarterly to senior leadership, highlighting cross-team wins. 6. Continuous Improvement: Established a rotating review board of senior engineers to assess new microservice proposals, ensuring alignment with the blueprint and maintaining collective ownership.
Result: Within six months, 85% of services migrated to the new architecture. Average API response time improved by 50%, incident rate dropped by 75%, and overall engineering satisfaction with the platform rose from 3.0 to 4.4 on our internal survey. The governance model became the template for subsequent platform rollouts.
Ready to master your STAR stories and demonstrate cross-team influence in your next interview? Subscribe to Kaizen Coach for more expert guides or schedule a personalized coaching session today!